|
February 15, 2001
News this month
New screening method for lung cancer?
A type of CT scan appears
better at detecting early lung cancer than standard chest X-rays,
according to a study in The Lancet. Low-radiation-dose computed
tomography (low-dose CT) was evaluated as part of a study to diagnose
lung cancer in people at high risk for the disease. Lung cancer
is significantly more treatable when diagnosed in the early stages;
however, no widely used screening tools are currently available.
Chest X-ray vs. CT scan
The seven-year baseline study was led by Claudia I. Henschke, MD,
who organized the Early Lung Cancer Action Project in 1992. Henschkes
goal was to see whether chest X-rays or low-dose CT scans were better
at detecting early lung cancers. In all, 1,000 symptom-free volunteers
who were at least 60 years old and who were at high risk of lung
cancer were enrolled. All patients had a history of cigarette smoking.
Each received a chest X-ray as well as a low-dose CT scan.
Initial results showed that low-dose CT scans were
better at detecting early lung cancers.
Encouraging results
Initial results, published in the July 10, 1999, issue of The Lancet,
showed that low-dose CT was dramatically better at detecting nodules
as small as 3 mm in the lungs. Additional testing is required to determine
if nodules are benign or cancerous. When comparing CT scans to standard
chest X-rays, the researchers found that using CT scans:
- Noncalcified nodules
were three times more likely to show up
- Cancerous tumors
were four times more likely to be detected
- Stage I lung cancers
were six times more likely to be detected
Among the 1,000 participants,
233 patients had a positive result (one or more nodules present) and
767 had a negative result (no nodules or cancer detected) using the
CT scan. The chest X-ray was significantly less reliable. Using a
chest X-ray for screening, only 68 of the same patients had a positive
result (compared with 233) and only seven cases of cancer were detected,
compared to 27 by CT scan.
The chest X-ray was significantly less reliable.
How the study was done
Each low-dose CT and chest X-ray was read independently by two board-certified
chest radiologists. If no noncalcified nodules were identified, the
report was negative. If between one and six noncalcified nodules were
present, the report was classified as positive. More than six nodules
were categorized as diffuse disease, more likely attributable to another
type of lung disease. The size, location, shape and edge of nodules
were also noted. If noncalcified nodules were detected, patients went
on for further evaluation, using standard-dose diagnostic CT of the
chest.
There will be false positives using CT scans and
more long-term follow-up is needed.
This is not the first time imaging studies have been used to identify
lung cancer. In the mid 1970s, four studies using chest X-ray and
sputum cytology to identify people with lung cancer failed to show
an increase in overall survival. This setback discouraged research
in this field for years.
Dr. Henschke cautioned there will be false positives using CT scans
and that more long-term follow-up is needed.
Physician Referral Online
A free and confidential service
of Yale-New Haven Hospital.
Physician Referral Online
Using your own criteria, you can request information from a database
of 900 area physicians who have registered to participate.
Request an appointment
We would be happy to assist you in scheduling an appointment with
a member of the hospital's medical staff. Use the link above or
call:
203-688-2000
or toll free
1-888-700-6543
to talk with a referral coordinator.
|

|

Detecting lung cancer using low-dose CT scans
Lung cancer takes
a terrible toll. It is the leading cause of cancer in the U.S.,
with about 171,000 new cases diagnosed this year. Nearly 159,000
men and women will die from it. These numbers have leveled off recently,
but we dont expect them to improve much. Its important
to note that about 90 percent of lung cancers are directly related
to cigarette smoking.
"Lung cancer does not usually cause symptoms in the early
stages
."
Lung cancer does not usually cause symptoms in the early stages and
there have been no good screening tools to detect it early, when it
is most treatable. So the vast majority of patients present with cancers
that have spread to lymph nodes or other parts of the body. As a result,
the overall cure rate for these patients is only about 14 percent.
A survivable cancer if caught early
However, for early stage cancer, five-year survival rates approach
70 percent. If there was a way to detect the disease earlier, tens
of thousands of lives could be potentially saved. So theres
been a long-standing interest in developing ways to detect lung cancer
early.
"For early stage [lung] cancer, five-year survival rates approach
70 percent."
No calls for screening
Because a chest X-ray may not be sufficiently sensitive to identify
an early lung cancer, there have not been calls for widespread screening
for lung cancer. Only a small number of organizations, such as the
American Thoracic Society, have advocated screening. They recommend
middle-aged smokers have an annual chest X-ray.
Compelling information
This particular study by Dr. Henschke is important because it suggests
recent advances in radiographic imaging may play a role in detecting
disease earlier. This information is very compelling. In general,
the new CT equipment works more rapidly, thus exposing the patient
to lower doses of radiation than standard CT, and it seems to have
the capacity to identify disease.
"Its reasonable to expect that using low-dose CT scans
will identify patients at more curable stages."
Its reasonable to expect that using low-dose CT scans will identify
patients at more curable stages. What does that mean for the average
person concerned about lung cancer today? A low-dose CT scan offers
the opportunity for patients who get an annual screening to do something
this year to potentially improve their chances of survival.
Cure vs. cost
When any new type of procedure is introduced, the first question asked
is whether it works. Thats a medical question that can be answered
by performing clinical trials that evaluate this screening tool, like
one study being done at Yale.
The next questionwhether it will be widely usedis based
partly on costs. These issues are societal questions and will be addressed
differently in different countries. At the moment the CT scan for
lung cancer screening is not covered by insurance in the U.S. So those
people wishing to have it done have to pay for it themselves.
Eventually, these costs will have to be compared with the tremendous
physical and emotional cost of caring for patients with advanced lung
cancer cases.
Dr. John Murren
is a medical oncologist specializing in lung cancer at Yale-New
Haven Hospital and an associate professor of internal medicine and
medical oncology at Yale School of Medicine. He is affiliated with
the Yale Cancer Center.
For the 12th year in a row, Yale-New Haven
has been highly ranked by U.S. News & World Report for its programs in gynecology.
|