Click here for YNHH home page.


Sign up for HealthLINK.

Can we help?

Follow up on this month's He@lthLINK

 


Phone Numbers

Directory assistance
(203) 688-4242

Patient information
(203) 688-4177

Adult emergency
(203) 688-2222

Children's emergency
(203) 688-3333

Admitting
(203) 688-2221

Children's admitting
(203) 688-3331

Psychiatric admitting
(203) 688-9907



Mailing address:
Yale-New Haven Hospital
20 York Street
New Haven, CT
06510-3202





Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA HealthLINK: Cancer

February 15, 2001

News this month
New screening method for lung cancer?

A type of CT scan appears better at detecting early lung cancer than standard chest X-rays, according to a study in The Lancet. Low-radiation-dose computed tomography (low-dose CT) was evaluated as part of a study to diagnose lung cancer in people at high risk for the disease. Lung cancer is significantly more treatable when diagnosed in the early stages; however, no widely used screening tools are currently available.

Chest X-ray vs. CT scan
The seven-year baseline study was led by Claudia I. Henschke, MD, who organized the Early Lung Cancer Action Project in 1992. Henschke’s goal was to see whether chest X-rays or low-dose CT scans were better at detecting early lung cancers. In all, 1,000 symptom-free volunteers who were at least 60 years old and who were at high risk of lung cancer were enrolled. All patients had a history of cigarette smoking. Each received a chest X-ray as well as a low-dose CT scan.

Initial results showed that low-dose CT scans were better at detecting early lung cancers.

Encouraging results
Initial results, published in the July 10, 1999, issue of The Lancet, showed that low-dose CT was dramatically better at detecting nodules as small as 3 mm in the lungs. Additional testing is required to determine if nodules are benign or cancerous. When comparing CT scans to standard chest X-rays, the researchers found that using CT scans:

  • Noncalcified nodules were three times more likely to show up
  • Cancerous tumors were four times more likely to be detected
  • Stage I lung cancers were six times more likely to be detected

Among the 1,000 participants, 233 patients had a positive result (one or more nodules present) and 767 had a negative result (no nodules or cancer detected) using the CT scan. The chest X-ray was significantly less reliable. Using a chest X-ray for screening, only 68 of the same patients had a positive result (compared with 233) and only seven cases of cancer were detected, compared to 27 by CT scan.

The chest X-ray was significantly less reliable.

How the study was done
Each low-dose CT and chest X-ray was read independently by two board-certified chest radiologists. If no noncalcified nodules were identified, the report was negative. If between one and six noncalcified nodules were present, the report was classified as positive. More than six nodules were categorized as diffuse disease, more likely attributable to another type of lung disease. The size, location, shape and edge of nodules were also noted. If noncalcified nodules were detected, patients went on for further evaluation, using standard-dose diagnostic CT of the chest.

There will be false positives using CT scans and more long-term follow-up is needed.

This is not the first time imaging studies have been used to identify lung cancer. In the mid 1970s, four studies using chest X-ray and sputum cytology to identify people with lung cancer failed to show an increase in overall survival. This setback discouraged research in this field for years.

Dr. Henschke cautioned there will be false positives using CT scans and that more long-term follow-up is needed.


Physician Referral Online

A free and confidential service
of Yale-New Haven Hospital.

Physician Referral Online
Using your own criteria, you can request information from a database of 900 area physicians who have registered to participate.

Request an appointment
We would be happy to assist you in scheduling an appointment with a member of the hospital's medical staff. Use the link above or call:

203-688-2000
or toll free
1-888-700-6543
to talk with a referral coordinator.


John R. Murren, MD

Detecting lung cancer using low-dose CT scans

Lung cancer takes a terrible toll. It is the leading cause of cancer in the U.S., with about 171,000 new cases diagnosed this year. Nearly 159,000 men and women will die from it. These numbers have leveled off recently, but we don’t expect them to improve much. It’s important to note that about 90 percent of lung cancers are directly related to cigarette smoking.

"Lung cancer does not usually cause symptoms in the early stages…."

Lung cancer does not usually cause symptoms in the early stages and there have been no good screening tools to detect it early, when it is most treatable. So the vast majority of patients present with cancers that have spread to lymph nodes or other parts of the body. As a result, the overall cure rate for these patients is only about 14 percent.

A survivable cancer if caught early
However, for early stage cancer, five-year survival rates approach 70 percent. If there was a way to detect the disease earlier, tens of thousands of lives could be potentially saved. So there’s been a long-standing interest in developing ways to detect lung cancer early.

"For early stage [lung] cancer, five-year survival rates approach 70 percent."

No calls for screening
Because a chest X-ray may not be sufficiently sensitive to identify an early lung cancer, there have not been calls for widespread screening for lung cancer. Only a small number of organizations, such as the American Thoracic Society, have advocated screening. They recommend middle-aged smokers have an annual chest X-ray.

Compelling information
This particular study by Dr. Henschke is important because it suggests recent advances in radiographic imaging may play a role in detecting disease earlier. This information is very compelling. In general, the new CT equipment works more rapidly, thus exposing the patient to lower doses of radiation than standard CT, and it seems to have the capacity to identify disease.

"It’s reasonable to expect that using low-dose CT scans will identify patients at more curable stages."

It’s reasonable to expect that using low-dose CT scans will identify patients at more curable stages. What does that mean for the average person concerned about lung cancer today? A low-dose CT scan offers the opportunity for patients who get an annual screening to do something this year to potentially improve their chances of survival.

Cure vs. cost
When any new type of procedure is introduced, the first question asked is whether it works. That’s a medical question that can be answered by performing clinical trials that evaluate this screening tool, like one study being done at Yale.

The next question—whether it will be widely used—is based partly on costs. These issues are societal questions and will be addressed differently in different countries. At the moment the CT scan for lung cancer screening is not covered by insurance in the U.S. So those people wishing to have it done have to pay for it themselves.

Eventually, these costs will have to be compared with the tremendous physical and emotional cost of caring for patients with advanced lung cancer cases.


Dr. John Murren is a medical oncologist specializing in lung cancer at Yale-New Haven Hospital and an associate professor of internal medicine and medical oncology at Yale School of Medicine. He is affiliated with the Yale Cancer Center.

2002 Best Hospital--U.S. News Online

For the 12th year in a row, Yale-New Haven has been highly ranked by U.S. News & World Report for its programs in gynecology.


Spacer.
Subscribe to HealthLink.

Other related links.

Copyright 1999-2010.
Top of Page. Y-NHH. YNHHS. Site Editor.

Home page
Staff directory
Directions and parking
Online resources
Yale New Haven Health System
  Need a doctor?
Search
Comments
Top of page
Yale-New Haven Medical Center